Because of the three promising keywords comprising
its title, the filmgoer could rightfully expect to
see a large format (LF) film chockfull of gorgeous
black and white pandas, complemented by the
magnificent expanse and beauty of lush China, wrapped
in some tantalizing tale of adventure. Unfortunately,
only thirty percent of the film attends to these
expectations.
In total, LF footage of Pandas account for about
five to seven minutes of screen time. Though we trek
through China for the duration, only perhaps another
5 to 7 minutes of the footage captures the
spectacular. That's too bad, having been there
myself, I know China has much more to offer in the
way of sweeping scenes. In fact, the shear size of
the country and its landscape beg to be filmed in
large format. As for the adventure, it's really more
of a mild journey with a few contrived
spills/wannabe-thrills.
So then, what makes up sixty percent of the
picture? Answer: The historical (1936) story of Ruth
Harkness retracing the steps of her passed husband
while romancing the panda more in concept than the
tangible. Not a totally uninteresting premise, but
perhaps not one meant for the big movie. Gorgeously
filmed, expertly lit, and rather impressively acted
(for the format), this tale provides nearly no big
screen drama and extremely limited big screen
"moments."
Of course, a shot of a great panda munching on
bamboo will no doubt steal your heart (as it did
mine) and start you giggling; unfortunately, such
instances are as rare as the panda itself.
Additionally, besides the trek following in the
footsteps of so many other "journeys into the wild
films," "Panda" also steps into the ugly bear trap of
the evil hunter cliché. Worse yet, despite good
acting, decent dialogue, and obviously skilled
filmmaking, the picture cannot avoid an extended lull
(no doubt, the greatest sin of a LF picture). Such
flaws could and should have been identified and
eliminated in the scripting stage. Audiences do not
go to LF films for the acting. We can tolerate a
small percentage of "talking heads," but we are there
for the sensory!
How else could "Panda" have been improved?
Suggestion: Drop the history lesson. The tale
hog-ties the filmmakers, preventing them from showing
us what we want to see - sweeping shots of a country
that could overload that huge screen with natural
beauty. Give us our aerial shots! There's no need to
confine the focus to Ruth's linear passage or even to
the panda's habitat. Show us China's splendors, then
show us the panda. There's no need to artificially
recreate the stereotypical hunter for us to point
fingers at. Show us the panda in the wild in all its
glory. That should be enough to win our hearts.
Certainly, pandas naturally have that allure, and
these are professional filmmakers - I have no doubt
they'd have nailed that goal. Then leave the message
for preservation for the credit scroll narrative as
done in this current version. As is, I find the
heavy-handed message artistically inappropriate and
to some degree insulting.
One other point of frustration: rather closely
tied into the premise is the hypothesis that pandas
might actually be tame gentle animals despite their
reputation as dangerous beasts. This looming question
kept me interested (in a non-large-format kind of
way) when all else failed; however the picture never
resolves the issue. Yes, we see Ruth rubbing bellies
with a cub, but would momma bear be so docile? The
film straddles the issue, avoiding a direct answer
while seemingly implying anecdotally through pictures
that pandas won't maul anyone. (Perhaps a gentle
animal is an easier one to protect?) Further clouding
comes from the press kit itself, revealing that the
two cubs were actually raised in captivity.
All in all, "China: the Panda Adventure" recreates
a simplified tale fit for TV, shows off a pawfull of
sweet pandas and offers up a tiny tea cup serving of
truly memorable China pans. Unfortunately, an
experienced crew of professionals finds themselves
bound by a script that should have never been
approved for the large screen.
Interesting facts from the production
notes:
Compin: "When pandas are born they are tiny, and
weigh about 3 1/2 ounces. They are occasionally born
in pairs but in the wild the mother would only raise
one. In the Wolong Reserve's captive breeding program
they take one baby away and share the rearing with
the mother panda. They actually alternate the babies
so each gets a week with the mother and a week with
the breeders."
Horton: "The two baby pandas that we cast in our
film were raised this way... half by the mother half
by people. We didn't know that at two months the
handlers remove both babies from the mother
completely. The two babies that we filmed lived
together and played together, but they hadn't seen
their mother again until she was brought to us for
filming. The handlers related to us later that they
weren't sure how the mother would respond to seeing
both babies brought back together, but she seemed
just as thrilled as the handlers were surprised. So
those scenes in the film where the twins are climbing
all over their mother are actually from that real
reunion."
|